Cadspro

CFD Without Meshing

XFlow uses the Lattice Boltzmann method to simulate fluid dynamics without manual mesh generation. Complex geometries, moving bodies, transient flows — handled automatically.

Traditional CFD vs XFlow

Traditional CFD

  • Manual mesh generation (hours to days)
  • Geometry must be watertight and clean
  • Remeshing required for moving parts
  • Mesh quality directly affects accuracy
  • Complex setups for transient flows

XFlow

  • Automatic lattice generation (minutes)
  • Works with dirty/imperfect CAD geometry
  • Moving bodies handled natively
  • Lattice adapts automatically to flow features
  • Transient analysis is the default mode

Lattice Boltzmann Method

Instead of solving the Navier-Stokes equations on a mesh, XFlow models fluid behaviour at the particle level using the Lattice Boltzmann equation. The computational domain is automatically discretised into a lattice of nodes — no manual mesh generation required.

The lattice adapts in real-time to flow features, refining where needed and coarsening elsewhere. This makes XFlow particularly powerful for problems that are traditionally painful to mesh: rotating machinery, free-surface flows, and geometries with small gaps and complex surfaces.

Fast Setup

Import CAD → define boundary conditions → run. Minutes instead of days.

Moving Bodies

Prescribed and free motion handled natively — no remeshing during simulation.

Any Geometry

Dirty CAD, non-watertight surfaces, tiny gaps — XFlow doesn't care.

Applications by Industry

Automotive

External aerodynamics, underhood thermal management, HVAC systems, water/dirt soiling analysis

Aerospace

High-lift device analysis, landing gear aeroacoustics, thermal management, ice accretion

Architecture

Wind loading on structures, pedestrian-level comfort, natural ventilation, smoke extraction

Electronics

Heat sink optimisation, enclosure ventilation, component thermal management, data centre cooling

Marine

Hull resistance prediction, propeller analysis, sloshing in tanks, maneuvering simulation

Energy

Wind turbine performance, heat exchanger design, turbomachinery flows, solar thermal systems

XFlow vs Alternatives

An honest comparison to help you choose the right CFD tool for your workflow.

XFlowANSYS FluentOpenFOAM
Meshing RequiredNoYes (hours)Yes (manual)
Dirty CAD GeometryHandled nativelyRequires cleanupRequires cleanup
Moving BodiesBuilt-inDynamic mesh (complex)Possible (advanced)
Transient FlowsDefault modeSupportedSupported
MultiphaseYes (VOF + particles)Yes (multiple models)Yes (limited)
Learning CurveModerateSteepVery steep
Licence CostCommercialCommercial (higher)Open source
SupportVia Cadspro (local)Via resellerCommunity

System Requirements

OSWindows 10/11 (64-bit), select Linux distributions
CPUMulti-core processor (more cores = faster)
RAM16 GB minimum, 32+ GB recommended
GPUProfessional GPU recommended, GPU acceleration supported
StorageSSD, size depends on simulation complexity
HPCCluster computing and cloud deployment supported

Frequently Asked Questions

XFlow pricing depends on the licence configuration (node-locked vs network, module selection, HPC cores). Contact us for a personalised quote — we provide India-specific pricing within 48 hours.

No. XFlow uses the Lattice Boltzmann method which automatically generates a computational lattice around your geometry. This eliminates the traditional mesh generation step entirely.

XFlow is inherently transient. For quasi-steady results, you run the simulation until the flow stabilises. This approach captures phenomena that steady-state solvers miss.

XFlow supports STEP, IGES, STL, CATIA, SOLIDWORKS, NX, and other common formats. It handles non-watertight and imperfect geometry that would require cleanup in mesh-based solvers.

XFlow has a gentler learning curve than traditional CFD tools because it eliminates meshing. However, interpreting CFD results still requires engineering judgement. We offer training programs to get your team productive.

XFlow excels at problems involving complex geometry, moving bodies, and transient flows where meshing is traditionally difficult. ANSYS Fluent has broader model coverage for specialised physics. The right choice depends on your application.

See XFlow in Action

Request a personalised demo with your own geometry — our CFD engineers will show you the meshless workflow end to end.